UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions2Judges2Parties3Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleUPC decisions are generally enforceable in the US under comity principlesClear all

Filtering to principle: UPC decisions are generally enforceable in the US under comity principles

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
security for costs under r. 158 rop requires concrete evidence of claimant's financial incapacity or enforcement difficulties, not mere us domicile110%
ordering security based solely on non-eu domicile constitutes unlawful discrimination under art. 47 eu charter110%
upc decisions are generally enforceable in the us under comity principles110%
right to effective remedy under art. 47 eu charter constrains security-for-costs orders110%
intangible assets (patents) may be available to satisfy a cost order against a patent-holding entity110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
nst as a us-based npe should be ordered to provide eur 200,000 security for costsRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.