UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleauxiliary requests in pi proceedings based on amended claim versions are generally inadmissibleClear all

Filtering to principle: auxiliary requests in pi proceedings based on amended claim versions are generally inadmissible

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
auxiliary requests in pi proceedings based on amended claim versions are generally inadmissible110%
filing auxiliary requests with amended claims implies the granted patent is probably invalid110%
pi proceedings under art. 62 upca are assessed solely on the granted claim version110%
interim cost reimbursement requires substantiated and verifiable cost submissions110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
auxiliary requests for provisional measures based on amended claim versions should be admittedClaimant1
preliminary cost reimbursement of eur 168,000 should be granted to respondentRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.