UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlecosts follow the event per Art. 69(1) UPCA; split where each party succeeds on partClear all

Filtering to principle: costs follow the event per Art. 69(1) UPCA; split where each party succeeds on part

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
purposive claim construction of 'decoupling element'110%
front-loaded proceedings prohibit strategic new attacks at oral hearing110%
costs follow the event per art. 69(1) upca; split where each party succeeds on part110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
defendants' led power supply products infringe ep 2 011 218 b1Claimant1
patent ep 2 011 218 is invalid (counterclaim for revocation)Respondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.