UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlecosts gap in absence of main proceedings addressed by analogy to R. 118.5 RoP or R. 213.2 RoPClear all

Filtering to principle: costs gap in absence of main proceedings addressed by analogy to R. 118.5 RoP or R. 213.2 RoP

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
imminent infringement characterised by preparations fully completed and infringement only awaiting action110%
r. 295 rop stay of proceedings does not apply to pi proceedings110%
claim interpretation mandatory for court and parties; technical argumentation must be focused and precise in pi proceedings110%
extraterritorial group company infringement liability110%
costs gap in absence of main proceedings addressed by analogy to r. 118.5 rop or r. 213.2 rop110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
preliminary injunction should be granted to prevent imminent infringement of ep 3 805 248 by celltrion's biosimilarClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.