UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlecourt must consider the likelihood of epo opposition/tba outcome when assessing validityClear all

Filtering to principle: court must consider the likelihood of epo opposition/tba outcome when assessing validity

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
provisional measures require sufficient certainty of patent validity, not merely the court's own view110%
court must consider the likelihood of epo opposition/tba outcome when assessing validity110%
patent claims interpreted from the skilled person's perspective, considering purpose110%
validity doubt from consistent adverse tba history defeats a pi application110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
preliminary injunction against amgen entities based on ep 3 167 888 b1Claimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.