Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: delay in analysing known facts cannot revive urgency

Most-litigated legal principles

Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.

Principle	Cases	Decided	Patentee success
temporal urgency for provisional measures under r. 211.4 rop	1	1	0%
urgency assessed from when applicant knew or should have known of infringement	1	1	0%
delay in analysing known facts cannot revive urgency	1	1	0%
costs follow the event in pi proceedings	1	1	0%

Most-rejected arguments

Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

Argument	Party	Cases
cilag had urgency because it only became aware of the true extent of infringement and market risk (sana acceptance, price erosion risk) in april 2025	Claimant	1
david vs. goliath argument: cilag's larger market position vs. rivolution's smaller size creates special urgency	Claimant	1
applications to submit further evidence after the oral hearing should be admitted	Claimant	1

Most-cited prior art

References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.