UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlenumber of validity arguments in PI proceedings limited to best three from respondent's perspectiveClear all

Filtering to principle: number of validity arguments in PI proceedings limited to best three from respondent's perspective

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
burden of proof for product composition claims: allege and prove composition features, not reasons for them11100%
risk of first infringement from cross-border distribution and advertising11100%
cease-and-desist declaration with penalty clause required to eliminate infringement risk; actus contrarius insufficient11100%
number of validity arguments in pi proceedings limited to best three from respondent's perspective11100%
temporal urgency in munich local division: two months (diverging from düsseldorf's one month)11100%
summary proceedings: full legal issue examination but limited to selected number of issues11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
application for seizure of goods should be maintained in fullClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.