UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlepreliminary assessment of infringement (more likely than not)Clear all

Filtering to principle: preliminary assessment of infringement (more likely than not)

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
urgency and necessity for provisional measures11100%
preliminary assessment of infringement (more likely than not)11100%
scope of information orders limited to cessation of infringement11100%
joint and several liability of defendants for costs11100%
recall orders as provisional measure11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
information order extending to prices and numbers of cabinets sold (for damages calculation)Claimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.