UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions0Judges3Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleprovisional measures injunction limited to the specific device at issue (gs1)Clear all

Filtering to principle: provisional measures injunction limited to the specific device at issue (gs1)

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
legitimate interest in injunction survives unilateral cease-and-desist declaration11100%
balance of interests under r. 211 rop — defendants who have left all relevant markets have no legitimate interest in opposing injunction11100%
urgency / promptness — arguments raised only at oral hearing without prior written notice and without drawing legal conclusion are rejected as inexcusably late11100%
provisional measures injunction limited to the specific device at issue (gs1)11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
application for information disclosure (sub (b) of the order sought)Claimant1
action is devoid of purpose because defendants already ceased infringementRespondent1
abbott acted with unreasonable delayRespondent1
security for costs of enforcement should be orderedRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.