UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlerevocation of patent defeats pending infringement actionClear all

Filtering to principle: revocation of patent defeats pending infringement action

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
problem-solution approach for inventive step110%
motivation to combine prior art references110%
revocation of patent defeats pending infringement action110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
patent ep 2 548 648 is valid and infringement claims should be upheldClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
ReferencePredominant roleCases
D3 (unspecified publication, shredder/mill technology)Obviousness combination1
D9 (unspecified publication, fibrous wood material grinding with oblique ribs/strips)Obviousness combination1