UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions2Judges2Parties3Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleright to effective remedy under Art. 47 EU Charter constrains security-for-costs ordersClear all

Filtering to principle: right to effective remedy under Art. 47 EU Charter constrains security-for-costs orders

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
security for costs under r. 158 rop requires concrete evidence of claimant's financial incapacity or enforcement difficulties, not mere us domicile110%
ordering security based solely on non-eu domicile constitutes unlawful discrimination under art. 47 eu charter110%
upc decisions are generally enforceable in the us under comity principles110%
right to effective remedy under art. 47 eu charter constrains security-for-costs orders110%
intangible assets (patents) may be available to satisfy a cost order against a patent-holding entity110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
nst as a us-based npe should be ordered to provide eur 200,000 security for costsRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.