UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases3Decisions3Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlesecurity for costs: EU domicile as factor reducing enforcement riskClear all

Filtering to principle: security for costs: EU domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
withdrawal of action by consent under r. 265.1 rop110%
security for costs: legitimate and real concern about recoverability (art. 69(4) upca; chint v jingao test)110%
security for costs: eu domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk110%
group guarantee as potential alternative to deposit or bank guarantee110%
connection joinder under r. 340.1 rop: must serve interests of proper administration and avoid inconsistent decisions110%
epo boa dismissal of appeal as factor leading to settlement110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
joinder (connection) of counterclaim for revocation from ld munich to cd paris proceedings under r. 340.1 rop (request 1)Respondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.