UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges4Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlestrict application principle under art. 76(1) upca for patent amendmentClear all

Filtering to principle: strict application principle under art. 76(1) upca for patent amendment

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
strict application principle under art. 76(1) upca for patent amendment110%
r. 30 rop requirement for application to amend patent110%
novelty and inventive step as grounds for revocation110%
costs follow the event under art. 69(1) upca110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
patent is valid and infringed by kodak's lithographic printing plate productsClaimant1
patent amendment application should be allowed to limit claims and preserve validityClaimant1
provisional injunction should be granted for the uk part of the patent pending further proceedingsClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.