UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties0Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principletemporal urgency in Munich Local Division: two months (diverging from Düsseldorf's one month)Clear all

Filtering to principle: temporal urgency in Munich Local Division: two months (diverging from Düsseldorf's one month)

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
burden of proof for product composition claims: allege and prove composition features, not reasons for them11100%
risk of first infringement from cross-border distribution and advertising11100%
cease-and-desist declaration with penalty clause required to eliminate infringement risk; actus contrarius insufficient11100%
number of validity arguments in pi proceedings limited to best three from respondent's perspective11100%
temporal urgency in munich local division: two months (diverging from düsseldorf's one month)11100%
summary proceedings: full legal issue examination but limited to selected number of issues11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
application for seizure of goods should be maintained in fullClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.