Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: withdrawal of action by consent under R. 265.1 RoP

Most-litigated legal principles

Recurring legal principles across 2 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.

Principle	Cases	Decided	Patentee success
withdrawal of action by consent under r. 265.1 rop	2	2	0%
no legitimate interest in continuation following settlement	1	1	0%
proceedings closed without cost decision where not requested	1	1	0%
security for costs: legitimate and real concern about recoverability (art. 69(4) upca; chint v jingao test)	1	1	0%
security for costs: eu domicile as factor reducing enforcement risk	1	1	0%
group guarantee as potential alternative to deposit or bank guarantee	1	1	0%
connection joinder under r. 340.1 rop: must serve interests of proper administration and avoid inconsistent decisions	1	1	0%
epo boa dismissal of appeal as factor leading to settlement	1	1	0%

Most-rejected arguments

Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

Argument	Party	Cases
joinder (connection) of counterclaim for revocation from ld munich to cd paris proceedings under r. 340.1 rop (request 1)	Respondent	1

Most-cited prior art

References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.