UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions3Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlewithdrawal of infringement action following out-of-court settlement is permissible under R. 265 RoPClear all

Filtering to principle: withdrawal of infringement action following out-of-court settlement is permissible under R. 265 RoP

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
withdrawal of infringement action following out-of-court settlement is permissible under r. 265 rop110%
partial (60%) reimbursement of court fees on withdrawal before closure of written procedure under r. 370.9(b)(i) rop110%
cost agreement between parties is binding and confirmed by court under r. 265.2(c) rop110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

No rejected-argument data in the current scope.

Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.