Overview · Filed: —
ACT_23636/2024
Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresMunich LDApplication for provisional measures—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
UPC (CFI) · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_443/2023 | limitation of validity arguments to best three in provisional measures | Binding | the number of arguments raised against the validity of the patent must generally be reduced to the best three from the respondent's point of view (UPC_CFI_443/2023 ACT_589207/2023 (LD Munich), order of 21 May 2024, 3rd LS) |
| UPC_CFI_452/2023 | temporal urgency — one month window | Distinguished | In view of the diverging case law on temporal urgency, which grants the applicant only one month, e.g. in UPC_CFI_452/2023 (Local Division Düsseldorf), order of 9 April 2024, GRUR-RS 2024, 7207, Rz. 128, the Local Division Munich adheres to its case law granting two months. |
| UPC_CFI_452/2024 | analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP — unintentional loophole required | Persuasive | UPC_CFI_452/2024 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 9 April 2024, headnote 2 and p. 34 f., GRUR- RS 2024, 7207, Rz. 161 - 163 |
| UPC_CFI_249/2023 | analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP (contra) | Distinguished | a.A.: UPC_CFI_249/2023 ( LD Munich), order of 19 December 2023, headnote, GRUR-RS 2023, 40572 |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | direct infringement acts | Binding | In case of a product claim directed to a composition it is sufficient for the applicant to allege and prove that at the time of any act of use under Art. 25 UPCA by the respondent, the attacked composition had all the features of the patent claim |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_435/2023 | hearing of respondent in provisional measures proceedings | Binding | UPC_CoA_435/2023; UPC_CoA_436/2023; UPC_CoA_437/2023; UPC_CoA_438/2023, Order of 3 April 2023, paragraph 2 |
Rules of Procedure · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118.5 | analogous application in provisional measures | Binding | For an analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP, the absence of an unintentional loophole is a basic requirement for such an application |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.