Overview · Filed: —
ACT_39091/2024
Wig and manufacturing method thereof
InfringementMain Infringement ActionParis LDInfringement Action—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
UPC (CFI) · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_278/2023 | claim construction – description inconsistent with claims cannot broaden claim scope | Persuasive | cf décision Agfa v Gucci, LD de Hambourg du 30 avril 2025, UPC_CFI_278/2023, Headnote 3: "Specifications in the description that are not consistent with the granted claims cannot serve as a basis of a broad interpretation of a claim." |
| UPC_CFI_471/2023 | infringement by equivalents – harmonised approach within UPC | Persuasive | cf Mannheim UPC LD, 6 juin 2025 - 471/2023- Headnote3 |
| UPC_CFI_376/2023 | infringement by equivalents – common denominator test (same function, same effect) | Persuasive | Brussels UPC LD, 17 janvier 2025, para. 98 - CFI 376/2023 |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | infringement by equivalents | Binding | La contrefaçon indirecte au sein de la JUB (Art. 26 AJUB et Art. 69 CBE et son protocole d'interprétation) |
| 69 | claim scope / equivalents – interpretation of claims | Binding | Art. 69 CBE et son protocole d'interprétation … il convient d'adopter une interprétation la plus harmonisée possible au sein de la JUB pour statuer sur les demandes de contrefaçon par équivalence |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.