ACT_3932/2024

DEVICE- ASSISTED SERVICES FOR PROTECTING NETWORK CAPACITY

InfringementMain Infringement ActionDusseldorf LDInfringement Action—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
9.2	added matter	Binding	The Court can reject a new line of arguments pursuant to R. 9.2 RoP in a case where the issue has been raised from the outset and the new argument is based on completely different passages of a lengthy document.
220.1	appeal	Binding	An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP).

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
73	appeal	Binding	An appeal against this decision may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party whose claims have been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, within two months of service of the decision (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1 (a) RoP, 224.1 (a) RoP).
82	enforcement	Binding	INFORMATION ON ENFORCEMENT (Art. 82 UPCA, Art. 37(2) UPCS, R. 118.8, 158.2, 354, 355.4 RoP)

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.