UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

ACT_547520/2023

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMunich LDInfringement Action
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

courtName.other · 4

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
65 (2)proceduralBindingat issue is not valid, neither as granted, nor as amended by auxiliary requests 1 and 2, and must be revoked in its entirety pursuant to Art. 138 (1) EPC and Art. 65 (2) UPCA. Claimant has defended the dependent claims by stating that the “depende
65 (5)infringementBindingl send a copy of this decision to the European Patent Office and to the national patent office of any Contracting Member States concerned, in accordance with Article 65 (5) UPCA, after this decision has become res iudicata effect. 4. All infring
73(1)proceduralBindingat the Court of Appeal, by any party which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions, within two months of the date of its notification (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1(a), 224.1(a) RoP). Information about enforcement (Art. 82 UPC
82proceduralBindingin part, in its submissions, within two months of the date of its notification (Art. 73(1) UPCA, R. 220.1(a), 224.1(a) RoP). Information about enforcement (Art. 82 UPCA, Art. Art. 37(2) UPCS, R. 118.8, 158.2, 354, 355.4 RoP) An authentic copy o

UPC (CFI) · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
UPC_CFI_233/2023proceduralBinding[FIRST PAGES] 1 Local Division Munich UPC_CFI_233/2023 Decision on the merits of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on July 31st 2024

EPC article · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
138(1)proceduralBindinghe above, the patent at issue is not valid, neither as granted, nor as amended by auxiliary requests 1 and 2, and must be revoked in its entirety pursuant to Art. 138 (1) EPC and Art. 65 (2) UPCA. Claimant has defended the dependent claims by stat
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.