ACT_579338/2023

PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringement Action—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
24	statement of defence — obligation to present reasons why action shall fail	Binding	the according facts have to be presented in the Statement of Defense and the Counterclaim for Revocation ... R. 24(g) RoP and the grounds for revocation have to be presented comprehensively, R. 25(1)(b) and (c) RoP
25	counterclaim for revocation — comprehensive presentation of grounds	Binding	grounds for revocation have to be presented comprehensively, R. 25(1)(b) and (c) RoP whereas the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP.
29	reply briefs limited to responding to matters raised	Binding	the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
28	prior use right — applicable national law	Binding	Where German Law is applicable upon a private prior use right according to Art. 28 UPCA, it is necessary that a firm and final decision to use the form of alleged prior use took place before the priority date.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.