UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_14947/2025

HERBICIDE COMPOSITIONS

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 5

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
371.1court fees — timing of paymentBindingR. 371.1 RoP specifies that fixed fees shall be paid at the time of lodging the relevant pleading or application and that the payment shall be made to one of the bank accounts indicated by the Court.
371.4court fees — value-based feesBindingThe same rule applies to the payment of value-based fees (R. 371.4 RoP).
15.2court fees — lodging conditioned on paymentBindinga pleading or application will not be deemed lodged until the court fees have been paid (R. 15.2 RoP).
371.2court fees — proof of paymentBindingThis interpretation is confirmed by R. 371.2 RoP, which provides that proof of payment of court fees must be provided together with the relevant pleading or application.
213.1provisional measures — obligation to commence main proceedingsBindingSumi Agro submits – in summary – that the Munich Local Division adopted an incorrect interpretation of R. 15.2 RoP and R. 213.1 RoP, referring also to Art. 60(8) and Art. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371 RoP.

EPC article · 2

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
70court fees — timing of paymentBindingArt. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371.1 RoP: court fees considered paid on time if transfer order given to bank at time of lodging the relevant pleading or application, provided payment is subsequently received.
60court feesBackgroundreferring also to Art. 60(8) and Art. 70(2) UPCA and R. 371 RoP.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.