UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_21602/2024

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A NETWORK USING A HARDWARE SECURITY ENGINE

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 7

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
273service — outside Contracting Member StatesBindingconcerning service of a Statement of claim on defendants in China and Taiwan (R.273 and R.274 RoP)
274service — Hague Convention procedureBindingAttempts to serve in China by any method provided for by the Hague Convention pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service permitted by the law of the state where service is to be effected
274.1service — Hague Convention method (China)BindingAttempts to serve in China by any method provided for by the Hague Convention pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service permitted by the law of the state where service is to be effected (R.274.1(b) RoP)
274.1service — law of state where service effectedBindingservice permitted by the law of the state where service is to be effected (R.274.1(b) RoP) or by alternative methods or at an alternative place (R.275 RoP) is permitted.
274.1service — diplomatic/consular channels (Taiwan)BindingSimilarly, attempts to serve in Taiwan by diplomatic or consular channels pursuant to R.274.1(a)(iii) shall be made.
275service — alternative methodBindingby alternative methods or at an alternative place (R.275 RoP) is permitted.
271.5service — not applicable to non-EU defendantsBindingAs said, R.271.5(a) RoP does not apply to these companies.

Court of Justice EU · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
Regulation (EU) 2020/1784service — EU service regulationBackgroundR.274.1(a)(i) RoP can also be understood to convey that there are substantive limitations to the applicability of Regulation 2020/1784 (see for example Article 1 of that Regulation).

courtName.other · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
Hague Convention Art. 15.2service — default judgment without certificateBackgroundArticle 15.2 of the Hague Convention provides that each Contracting State shall be free to declare that the judge may give judgment even if no certificate of service or delivery has been received
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.