APL_26889/2024

CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
83	procedural	Binding	Regulation, Art. 71c(2) of the Brussels I recast Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that the provisions apply where, during the transitional period of Art. 83 UPCA, proceedings are pending before the UPC and a national court, even if the pr
Brussels I Recast Regulation	FRAND	Binding	Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 17 September 2024 HEADNOTE 1. In the light of the objective of Art. 29 to 32 of the Brussels I recast Regulation, Art. 71c(2) of the Brussels I recast Regulation must be int
Brussels I Recast Regulation	jurisdiction	Binding	before the UPC and a national court, even if the proceedings before the national court were initiated prior to the transitional period. 2. Art. 31 of the Brussels I recast Regulation does not depart from the general principle of Art. 29 of that
Brussels I Recast Regulation	procedural	Binding	esignated court is seised subsequently of proceedings “involving the same cause of action and between the same parties”. 22. It follows that Art. 31 of the Brussels I recast Regulation does not apply in this case, since the parties to the procee

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_227/2024	FRAND	Binding	[FIRST PAGES] 1 Reference numbers: APL_26889/2024 UPC_CoA_227/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 17 September 2024 HEADNOTE 1. In the light of the objective of Art. 29 to
UPC_CoA_26889/2024	FRAND	Background	[FIRST PAGES] 1 Reference numbers: APL_26889/2024 UPC_CoA_227/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 17 September 2024 HEADNOTE 1. In the light of the object

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
19	jurisdiction	Binding	rties. 3. The request for a stay pursuant to Art. 30 of the Brussels I recast Regulation is to be regarded as a preliminary objection within the meaning of R. 19 RoP. KEYWORDS Appeal; Preliminary objection; Lis pendens and related actions;
19	procedural	Binding	. Therefore, the request for a stay pursuant to Art. 30 of the Brussels I recast Regulation is to be regarded as a preliminary objection within the meaning of R. 19 RoP. 24. Pursuant to Art. 30 of the Brussels I recast Regulation, the UPC may sta

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_484/2023	procedural	Binding	of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court, Central Division, Paris seat, dated 2 May 2024 □ Reference numbers: App_8708/2024 ACT_595045/2023 UPC_CFI_484/2023 ORD_13023/2024 FACTS AND REQUESTS OF THE PARTIES 1. Mala

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
German Federal Patent Court	jurisdiction	Background	in Germany. 2. On 29 April 2021, Nokia Solutions and Networks GmbH & Co. KG (hereinafter: Nokia Solutions) filed a revocation action against Mala with the German Federal Patent Court (docket no. 5 Ni 22/21 (EP), hereinafter: the German revocatio

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.