Overview · Filed: —
APL_38948/2024
POSITIONING OF MOBILE OBJECTS BASED ON MUTUALLY TRANSMITTED SIGNALS
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49(5) | language of proceedings — change on grounds of fairness | Binding | when deciding on a request to change the language of proceedings into the language of the patent on grounds of fairness: the internal working language of the parties, the possibility of internal coordination and of support on technical issues are relevant circumstances |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_101/2024 | language change — circumstances relevant to fairness | Binding | In addition to the circumstances stated by the Court of Appeal in its order of 17 April 2024 (APL_12116/2024, UPC_CoA_101/2024), when deciding on a request to change the language of proceedings into the language of the patent on grounds of fairness |
UPC (CFI) · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_26/2024 | internal working language as relevant circumstance for language change | Persuasive | the internal working language, the possibility of internal coordination and of support on technical issues only accessible in a location within the corporate group where the working language was English, were – rightly - taken into account as relevant circumstances in the Order of 30 May 2024 (App_22729/2024; UPC_CFI_26/2024) |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.