UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_46747/2024

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 3

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
262.1(b)jurisdictionBindingHEADNOTES: A member of the public generally has an interest that written pleadings and evidence are made available.
262.1(b)jurisdictionBindingPublic access to written pleadings and evidence, R.262.1 (b) RoP, pending appeal, application for provisional measures, parallel proceedings
206urgencyBackgroundThis principle applies regardless of whether or not the rendered order concerns an application for provisional measures (R.206 RoP).

UPC Court of Appeal · 2

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
Ocado v AutostorejurisdictionBindingThe general interest includes the protection of the integrity of proceedings (Ocado v Autostore, para 43).
Ocado v AutostorejurisdictionBindingAs the Court of Appeal in Ocado v Autostore (para 47) also has stated, a member of the public generally has an interest that written pleadings and evidence are made available.

EPC article · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
45jurisdictionBindingThe interests mentioned in Art. 45 UPCA include the protection of confidential information and personal data but are not limited thereto.

Court of Justice EU · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
C-514/07jurisdictionPersuasiveThe CJEU´s Judgment API v Commission (21 September 2010, C-514/07) cited by Abbott does not suggest that the access to these documents should be withheld as long as the case is pending.

UPC (CFI) · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
UPC_CFI_130/2024jurisdictionBackgroundLocal Division The Hague, 29 July 2024, ORD_39917/2024, App_39761/2024, UPC_CFI_130/2024; ACT_14944/2024.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.