UPClytics
View all cases

APL 47300/2024

·EP3342086: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS

Case details
Status
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Sven Krause (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Erik Lumens (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
Respondents
Reps: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Sep 6, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-09-06
    DismissedAppeal decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal rejected Motorola's request for a discretionary review of a Munich Local Division order that had denied leave to change its claim, finding that Motorola had not demonstrated that review was necessary to ensure consistent application and interpretation of the Rules of Procedure.

    Legal issues:Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)Leave to change claim (R. 263 RoP)Uniformity of UPC case law
Documents
  • 02D07250F2EF7302111AB7221F542C2F_en.pdf2024-09-06EN
Motorola Mobility LLC v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson — UPC APL 47300/2024 | UPClytics