UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

APL 47300/2024

·EP3342086: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Sven Krause (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); Erik Lumens (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Telecommunications
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
6. Sept. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-09-06
    AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal rejected Motorola's request for a discretionary review of a Munich Local Division order that had denied leave to change its claim, finding that Motorola had not demonstrated that review was necessary to ensure consistent application and interpretation of the Rules of Procedure.

    Rechtsfragen:Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)Leave to change claim (R. 263 RoP)Uniformity of UPC case law
Dokumente
  • 02D07250F2EF7302111AB7221F542C2F_en.pdf2024-09-06EN