Overview · Filed: —
APL_51115/2024
HERBICIDE COMPOSITIONS
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.1—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 213.2 | provisional measures — compensation if revoked | Binding | Where provisional measures are revoked … the Court may order the applicant to provide appropriate compensation for any injury caused by those measures (R. 213.2 RoP). |
| 354.2 | compensation where enforceable decision varied or revoked | Binding | Pursuant to R. 354.2 RoP, where during an action an enforceable decision or order of the Court is subsequently varied or revoked, the Court may order the party which has enforced such decision or order … to provide appropriate compensation |
| 211.5 | provisional measures — discretion on security | Binding | the Court has discretion ('may' in R. 211.5 RoP, first sentence, referred to above) for provisional measures when the defendant is heard (inter partes). |
| 118.5 | costs decision | Binding | A cost decision should be issued in the proceedings for provisional measures, since it concludes the action. |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | territorial scope of injunction — accession of new UPC state | Binding | There are no transitional rules connected to Art. 34 UPCA. When a UPC Signatory State ratifies and accedes, the application of Art. 34 UPCA should be automatic and not subject to limitations, from the day of accession. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.