APL 52763/2024

—·EP3096315 +2 more: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Case details: Status
—
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties: Claimants
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Reps: Christopher Weber (Kather Augenstein)
Respondents
Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.
Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.
Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
Odiporo GmbH
Shamrock Mobile GmbH
Reps: Fabian Schubach (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Kilian Seidel (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division: Court of Appeal
Judges: Rian Kalden · Permanent judge
Language: —
First decided: Sep 30, 2024

Decisions

2024-09-30
Appeal decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)
The Court of Appeal (single judge) denied Xiaomi's request for discretionary review of three first-instance orders concerning the extension of a time limit under R.29(d) RoP for filing a rejoinder in three parallel infringement proceedings brought by Panasonic before the Local Division Mannheim.
Legal issues:Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)Extension of time limits (R.29(d) RoP)Redacted pleadingsProcedural fairness

Documents