UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

APL 52763/2024

·EP3096315 +2 more: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Christopher Weber (Kather Augenstein)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Fabian Schubach (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Kilian Seidel (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
30. Sept. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-09-30
    BerufungsentscheidungRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal (single judge) denied Xiaomi's request for discretionary review of three first-instance orders concerning the extension of a time limit under R.29(d) RoP for filing a rejoinder in three parallel infringement proceedings brought by Panasonic before the Local Division Mannheim.

    Rechtsfragen:Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)Extension of time limits (R.29(d) RoP)Redacted pleadingsProcedural fairness
Dokumente
  • 45D64B936A8E0942A8D2AFAAD7519EAA_de.pdf2024-09-30DE
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH — UPC APL 52763/2024 | UPClytics