UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_58177/2024

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A NETWORK USING A HARDWARE SECURITY ENGINE

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 2

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
262Aaccess to confidential information; restricted personsBindingPursuant to R. 262A.6 RoP the number of persons to whom access is restricted shall be no greater than necessary in order to ensure compliance with the rights of the parties to the legal proceedings
262Aconfidential information protection orderBindingthe fact that the US attorneys are neither employees of Daedalus, nor representatives within the meaning of Art. 48 UPCA, does not preclude them from having full access to the confidential information under R. 262A RoP.

EPC article · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
48representation before UPCBindingR. 262A.6 RoP does not require that the person to whom access is given be an employee of a party or a representative within the meaning of Art. 48 of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (hereinafter: UPCA).
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.