Overview · Filed: —
APL_67135/2024
METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
UPC Court of Appeal · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_826/2024 | procedural | Binding | [FIRST PAGES] 1 Reference no.: UPC_CoA_826/2024 APL_67135/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 23 December 2024 concerning an application for a discretionary |
| UPC_CoA_67135/2024 | procedural | Background | [FIRST PAGES] 1 Reference no.: UPC_CoA_826/2024 APL_67135/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 23 December 2024 concerning an application for a discretionary review (Rule 22 |
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 220.3 | procedural | Binding | 35/2024 Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 23 December 2024 concerning an application for a discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) HEADNOTES: An unconditional application to reduce the amount of dama |
| 263 | procedural | Binding | be set aside, as far as leave to change the claim or amend the case is granted, and the Application (UPC_CFI_164/2024, App_55394/2024) filed by Suinno under R. 263 RoP to be rejected. 5. In summary, and as far as relevant, Microsoft argues the f |
UPC (CFI) · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_164/2024 | procedural | Binding | of the Unified Patent Court, Central division Paris, dated 26 November 2024 □ Reference numbers: App_55394/2024 ORD_62739/2024 ACT_18406/2024 UPC_CFI_164/2024 SUMMARY OF THE FACTS 1. On 26 November the Central Division (Par |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.