UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_68523/2024

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

courtName.other · 8

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
67disclosureBindingDer Antrag nach Art. 67 Abs. 1 EPGÜ, die Erteilung einer Auskunft anzuordnen, muss in der Regel die Frist zur Auskunftserteilung enthalten.
67disclosureBindingNach Art. 67 Abs. 1 b) EPGÜ sind auch Angaben über Preise, die vom Verletzer für die angegriffenen Ausführungsformen bezahlt wurden (Herstellerpreise), geschuldet.
73jurisdictionBindingBeschwerte Partei (Art. 73 Abs. 2 EPGÜ, R. 220.1, R. 220.2 VerfO)
69security for costsBindingGemäß Art. 69 Abs. 1 EPGÜ werden die Kosten des Rechtsstreits und sonstigen Kosten der obsiegenden Partei in der Regel, soweit sie zumutbar und angemessen sind, von der unterlegenen Partei getragen.
67disclosureBindingA request for an order to communicate information made under Art. 67(1) UPCA must, as a rule, include the time period for providing the information
67disclosureBindingThe information mentioned in Art. 67(1)(b) UPCA encompasses information on the prices paid by the infringer for the contested embodiments (manufacturer prices).
73jurisdictionBindingAdversely affected party (Art. 73(2) UPCA, R. 220.1, R. 220.2 RoP)
44language regimeDistinguishedPhilips also unsuccessfully argues that Art. 44 UPCA and R. 4.3 RoP require provision of information under Art. 67(1) UPCA to be in electronic form.

Rules of Procedure · 8

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
354.3disclosureBindingVorsehen von Zwangsgeldern (R. 354.3 VerfO)
354.4disclosureBindingFestsetzung von Zwangsgeldern (R. 354.4 VerfO)
118.8disclosureBindingist es Sache des Klägers, mit der Mitteilung der Vollstreckungsabsicht nach R. 118.8 VerfO dem Beklagten auch eine Frist für die Auskunftserteilung zu setzen.
354.3disclosureBindingProvision of penalty payments (R.354.3 RoP)
354.4disclosureBindingImposition of penalty payments (R. 354.4 RoP)
118.8disclosureBindingthe time period for providing the information (calculated from the notification under R. 118.8, first sentence, RoP
226jurisdictionBindingContent of the Statement of grounds of appeal, statement of reasons for setting aside the contested decision (R. 226(b) RoP)
4.1language regimeDistinguishedR. 4.1 RoP mandates that written submissions and other documents be submitted to the Registry or the relevant sub-registry in electronic form. These provisions apply solely to the correspondence between the parties and the Court.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.