Overview · Filed: —
CoA_PC 01/2024
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
Procedural & sub-applicationsOther Procedural—
Parties
Claimants
- Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
Reps: Pauline Debré (Linklaters LLP)
Respondents
- Photon Wave Co., Ltd.
Reps: Dorothea Hofer (Prüfer & Partner mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte); Andreas Oser (Prüfer & Partner mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte); Peter Klein (Prüfer & Partner mbB Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte)
Judges
- Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
- Emanuela GermanoJudge
- Emmanuel GougéJudge-Rapporteur
Patents
- EP3404726
- EP 3 404 726
CPC codes: H10H20/8506, H10W72/072, H10H20/835, H10H20/841, H10H20/857, H10H20/84, H10H20/85, H10H20/831, H10H20/8312, H10H20/81
Sector: Semiconductor Devices
Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: —
First decided: —
Language: —
Court of Appeal declared Photon Wave's appeal inadmissible. The CoA held that leave to appeal under R.220.2 RoP (other than together with an appeal against the final decision) must be expressly granted by the Court of First Instance and cannot be presumed. As no express leave to appeal was granted by the Paris Local Division, the appeal was inadmissible.