Overview · Filed: —
ORD_11863/2025
JUICE EXTRACTOR
Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersMannheim LDGeneric Order—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
EPC article · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | right to information | Binding | The rights to information provided by the UPCA as laid down in particular in Art. 67 UPCA and Art. 68 (3) (a) (b) UPCA in conjunction with R. 191 sentence 1 alternative 2 RoP |
| 68 | right to information | Binding | Art. 67 UPCA and Art. 68 (3) (a) (b) UPCA in conjunction with R. 191 sentence 1 alternative 2 RoP |
| 67 | compensation for use of published application | Binding | pay compensation pursuant to Art. 67 EPC in Germany. |
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.7 | jurisdiction — submission | Binding | Art. 26 Brussels Ia Reg. prevails over R. 19.7 RoP due to the primacy of Union Law. |
| 191 | right to information — scope | Binding | Art. 68 (3) (a) (b) UPCA in conjunction with R. 191 sentence 1 alternative 2 RoP |
Court of Justice EU · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art. 26 Brussels I Recast | jurisdiction — submission prevails over R. 19.7 RoP | Binding | Art. 26 Brussels Ia Reg. prevails over R. 19.7 RoP due to the primacy of Union Law. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.