View all cases
ORD 16788/2024
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionDefault judgmentCategoryDefault judgments
- Parties
- Claimants
- Abbott LaboratoriesOperating co.
- Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Operating co.
- Abbott FranceOperating co.
- Abbott (S.A./N.V.)Operating co.
- Abbott B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott s.r.l.Operating co.
- Abbott Scandinavia AktiebolagOperating co.
- Abbott GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Diagnostics GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Logistics B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Christian Dekoninck-Taylor Wessing
- Eelco Bergsma-Taylor Wessing
- Dietrich Kamlah-Taylor Wessing
- Christian Lederer-Taylor Wessing
- Patricia Cappuyns-Taylor Wessing
- François Pochart-August Debouzy
- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Thomas Adocker-Taylor Wessing
- Gisbert Hohagen-Taylor Wessing
Respondents- Dexcom Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Anne-Charlotte le Bihan-Bird & Bird LLP
- Laurent Labatte-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Mar 14, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
At the UPC: Abbott Group (67 cases)·Dexcom Group (39 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
Decisions
- 2024-03-14Decision By DefaultPublic
Summary: President of the Court of Appeal rejected Abbott entities' appeal as inadmissible. Abbott had filed an appeal under R. 220.2 RoP against a confidentiality order from the Paris Local Division without leave having been granted. The judge-rapporteur of the first instance had explicitly stated leave was not granted. Without leave, the appeal was inadmissible from the outset and therefore could not be withdrawn; the President declared the appeal rejected.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Admissibility of appeal without leave (R. 220.2 RoP)
- Inadmissible appeal cannot be withdrawn (R. 229.5 RoP)
Documents
- BDA82B4BDFC613EE7447903C6F5306DB_en.pdf2024-03-14EN