View all cases
ORD 16795/2024
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionDefault judgmentCategoryDefault judgments
- Parties
- Claimants
- Abbott LaboratoriesOperating co.
- Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Operating co.
- Abbott FranceOperating co.
- Abbott (S.A./N.V.)Operating co.
- Abbott B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott s.r.l.Operating co.
- Abbott Scandinavia AktiebolagOperating co.
- Abbott GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Diagnostics GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Logistics B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Christian Dekoninck-Taylor Wessing
- Patricia Cappuyns-Taylor Wessing
- François Pochart-August Debouzy
- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Dietrich Kamlah-Taylor Wessing
- Eelco Bergsma-Taylor Wessing
- Thomas Adocker-Taylor Wessing
- Christian Lederer-Taylor Wessing
- Gisbert Hohagen-Taylor Wessing
Respondents- Dexcom Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Anne-Charlotte le Bihan-Bird & Bird LLP
- Laurent Labatte-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Mar 14, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
At the UPC: Abbott Group (67 cases)·Dexcom Group (39 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
Decisions
- 2024-03-14Decision By DefaultPublic
Summary: The President of the Court of Appeal declared the Abbott entities' appeal inadmissible from the outset because it was brought without leave to appeal as required under Rule 220.2 RoP, and noted that an inadmissible appeal cannot be withdrawn.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Inadmissibility of appeal without leave (Rule 220.2 RoP)
- Withdrawal of inadmissible appeal
- Confidentiality order penalty clause
Documents
- 32F3738613007CB6B5F4AC07A5CB2530_en.pdf2024-03-14EN