UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 31755/2025

·EP3918974: COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley); Malte Frese (Hemmer Lindfeld Frese)
Respondents
Reps: Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Language
First decided
Jul 1, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-07-01
    Generic Order

    Order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_542/2025 and UPC_CoA_526/2025) staying appeal proceedings concerning security for costs in full, following the insolvency of the Easee companies. Both Easee and Visibly had cross-appealed the Hamburg Local Division's order requiring EUR 75,000 security for the revocation action. The Court of Appeal stayed both appeals pursuant to R. 295m RoP due to insolvency proceedings regarding the Easee companies.

    Legal issues:Stay of proceedings due to insolvency (R. 295m RoP)Security for costsCross-appeals on security for costs order
Documents
  • 997B7E541D443C20CF00D9FCF1873AA0_en.pdf2025-07-01EN