UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

ORD 31755/2025

·EP3918974: COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Marc Grunwald (Peterreins Schley); Malte Frese (Hemmer Lindfeld Frese)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
1. Juli 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-07-01
    Generic Order

    Order from the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_542/2025 and UPC_CoA_526/2025) staying appeal proceedings concerning security for costs in full, following the insolvency of the Easee companies. Both Easee and Visibly had cross-appealed the Hamburg Local Division's order requiring EUR 75,000 security for the revocation action. The Court of Appeal stayed both appeals pursuant to R. 295m RoP due to insolvency proceedings regarding the Easee companies.

    Rechtsfragen:Stay of proceedings due to insolvency (R. 295m RoP)Security for costsCross-appeals on security for costs order
Dokumente
  • 997B7E541D443C20CF00D9FCF1873AA0_en.pdf2025-07-01EN