UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 3184/2025

·EP3797685: SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND SENSOR ELECTRONICS UNIT COMMUNICATION

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Jérôme Kommer (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Katrin Gerstenberg (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Sebastian Scholz (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Laurin Haasis (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Peter Klusmann (Hoffmann Eitle); David Sproston (Hoffmann Eitle); Mark Jones (Hoffmann Eitle)
Respondents
Reps: Dietrich Kamlah (Taylor Wessing); Christian Lederer (Taylor Wessing); Gisbert Hohagen (Taylor Wessing); Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing); Eelco Bergsma (Taylor Wessing); François Pochart (August Debouzy)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Healthcare Informatics
Language
First decided
Jan 24, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-01-24
    WithdrawnGeneric Order

    Court of Appeal order allowing withdrawal of the infringement appeal and counterclaim for revocation filed by DexCom against Abbott companies, pursuant to R. 265 RoP. The withdrawal was allowed, proceedings declared closed, and the impugned first-instance decision became ineffective. Court held that withdrawal may be filed in appeal proceedings, that withdrawal of a revocation counterclaim renders amendment requests ineffective, and that closure of proceedings renders the impugned decision ineffective.

    Legal issues:Withdrawal of action (R. 265 RoP)Withdrawal in appeal proceedingsEffect of withdrawal of counterclaim for revocationReimbursement of court fees (R. 370.9 RoP)
Documents
  • D0BFB1E74E14EC72666408FF03CF2DE0_en.pdf2025-01-24ENGLISH