UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

ORD_3184/2025

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND SENSOR ELECTRONICS UNIT COMMUNICATION

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeVerfahrensführungsanordnungenCourt of AppealGeneric OrderVergleich erfolgt: Nach Hauptsache
Parteien

Kläger

Vertreter: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel); Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel); Jérôme Kommer (Quinn Emanuel); Katrin Gerstenberg (Quinn Emanuel); Sebastian Scholz (Quinn Emanuel); Laurin Haasis (Quinn Emanuel); Peter Klusmann (Hoffmann Eitle); David Sproston (Hoffmann Eitle); Mark Jones (Hoffmann Eitle)

Beklagte

Vertreter: Dietrich Kamlah (Taylor Wessing); Christian Lederer (Taylor Wessing); Gisbert Hohagen (Taylor Wessing); Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing); Eelco Bergsma (Taylor Wessing); François Pochart (August Debouzy)
Richter
  • Rian KaldenPresiding judge
  • Ingeborg SimonssonLegally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
  • Patricia RombachLegally qualified judge
  • Hergen KapelsTechnically qualified judge
  • Udo MatterTechnically qualified judge
Patente
  • EP3797685
CPC-Codes: A61B5/4839, A61B5/14865, A61B5/6898, A61B2560/0252, H04L67/12, G16H40/63, A61B5/0015, G16H40/60, A61B5/1116, A61B5/0004, A61B5/14532, A61B5/14546

Sektor: Healthcare Informatics

Ausgang
Zurückgenommen
Eingereicht:
Erste Entscheidung: 24. Jan. 2025
Sprache:
Vergleich erfolgt: Nach Hauptsachesettled commercially

Court of Appeal order allowing withdrawal of the infringement appeal and counterclaim for revocation filed by DexCom against Abbott companies, pursuant to R. 265 RoP. The withdrawal was allowed, proceedings declared closed, and the impugned first-instance decision became ineffective. Court held that withdrawal may be filed in appeal proceedings, that withdrawal of a revocation counterclaim renders amendment requests ineffective, and that closure of proceedings renders the impugned decision ineffective.