ORD_3876/2025

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersParis LDGeneric Order—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
33	jurisdiction	Binding	the expression "may be" means that the defendant has the possibility in his statement of defence to challenge the validity of the patent that is asserted against him
33	jurisdiction	Binding	the last sentence of Article 33.4, which states that an action for revocation of a patent must only be raised before the local division in charge of the infringement action for that patent.
33	jurisdiction	Background	it refers to a situation provided for in Article 33.5 UPCA (CD first seized), which is different from that provided for in Article 33.4 UPCA.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_1/2023	jurisdiction	Distinguished	the order ruled by the Central Division of Munich (CD Munich, order 560432 case CFI_1/2023) to which PHOTON WAVE refers in support of its reasoning is not relevant to the present case since it refers to a situation provided for in Article 33.5 UPCA

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
313.2	intervention	Binding	taking into account the fact that the intervener (in accordance with Rule 313.2 RoP) can only intervene to support the procedural strategy of the defendant

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.