Overview · Filed: —
ORD_6847/2025
CURING OF PHOTO-CURABLE PRINTING PLATES
Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersMunich LDGeneric Order—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
EPC article · 7
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | UPC jurisdiction over infringement actions including pre-entry-into-force acts | Binding | The UPC's jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA, Art. 2g), Art. 3c) UPCA also covers infringement actions to the extent that they are based on acts of use which are alleged to have taken place before the UPCA entered into force |
| 2 | definition of patent infringement | Binding | The UPC's jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA, Art. 2g), Art. 3c) UPCA also covers infringement actions |
| 3 | scope of application of UPCA | Binding | Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA, Art. 2g), Art. 3c) UPCA also covers infringement actions to the extent that they are based on acts of use which are alleged to have taken place before the UPCA entered into force |
| 83 | opt-out from UPC jurisdiction | Background | On 30 May 2023, the Claimant made use of the possibility to opt out under Art. 83 (3) UPCA (opt-out) for the patent at issue. |
| 84 | withdrawal of opt-out | Background | It withdrew from this opt-out on 26 August 2024 pursuant to Art. 84 para. 4 UPCA (opt-in). |
| 31 | international jurisdiction of the UPC | Binding | if the international jurisdiction of the UPC is at issue, this must be determined in accordance with Art. 31 UPCA without recourse to the applicable law. |
| 56 | powers of the court regarding remedies | Binding | to examine whether the procedural powers pursuant to Art. 56 et seq. UPCA cover the actual or threatened infringement of patents asserted in the infringement action at all. |
Rules of Procedure · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | preliminary objection to jurisdiction | Binding | By pleading dated 10 October 2024, the Defendants filed a preliminary objection pursuant to Rule 19 RoP. |
courtName.other · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brussels Ia Regulation | distinction between jurisdiction and applicable law | Persuasive | The distinction between jurisdiction and applicable law is also recognized at European level, as evidenced by the Brussels Ia Regulation (EU), for example. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.