UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 9090/2025

·EP2263098: POSITIONING OF MOBILE OBJECTS BASED ON MUTUALLY TRANSMITTED SIGNALS

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein); Benedikt Walesch (Kather Augenstein); Melissa Lutz (Kather Augenstein)
Respondents
Reps: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Jesko Preuß (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Andreas Hahne (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Judges
Technology
Measurement & Testing
Language
First decided
Apr 14, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-04-14
    Generic Order

    The Düsseldorf Local Division exercised its discretion under Art.33(3)(a) UPCA to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation jointly in the Ona Patents v Google case concerning EP2263098, finding that a joint hearing was appropriate for reasons of efficiency and enabling simultaneous decision on validity and infringement.

    Legal issues:Bifurcation decision (Art. 33(3) UPCA, R.37 RoP)Joint hearing of infringement and revocation counterclaimProcedural efficiency
Documents
  • 3E52F09A6D9553B8C6E402DE60EB05E5_en.pdf2025-04-14EN