ORD 9090/2025

—·EP2263098: POSITIONING OF MOBILE OBJECTS BASED ON MUTUALLY TRANSMITTED SIGNALS

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
Ona Patents SL
Vertreter: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein); Benedikt Walesch (Kather Augenstein); Melissa Lutz (Kather Augenstein)
Beklagte
Google Ireland Limited
Google Commerce Limited
Vertreter: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Jesko Preuß (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Andreas Hahne (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Division: Dusseldorf LD
Richter: Ronny Thomas · Presiding judge
Berenice Thom · Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
Margot Kokke · Legally qualified judge
Technology: Measurement & Testing
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 14. Apr. 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-04-14
Generic Order
The Düsseldorf Local Division exercised its discretion under Art.33(3)(a) UPCA to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation jointly in the Ona Patents v Google case concerning EP2263098, finding that a joint hearing was appropriate for reasons of efficiency and enabling simultaneous decision on validity and infringement.
Rechtsfragen:Bifurcation decision (Art. 33(3) UPCA, R.37 RoP)Joint hearing of infringement and revocation counterclaimProcedural efficiency

Dokumente