UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 16448/2025

·EP2661892: MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Withdrawal Applications
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tim Smentkowski (Arnold Ruess)
Respondents
Reps: Steffen Steininger (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Benjamin Schröer (Hogan Lovells International LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Apr 22, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-04-22
    Application Rop 265

    Court of Appeal (Panel 1a) order on Amazon's appeal against a Munich Local Division order refusing Amazon's R. 190 RoP request for production of unredacted Nokia documents in infringement proceedings concerning EP 2 661 892. The appeal became moot (Erledigung der Hauptsache, R. 360 RoP) following a development in the main proceedings, and the Court issued a procedural order addressing costs in the now-resolved appeal.

    Legal issues:Production of evidence (R. 190 RoP)Unredacted document disclosureMootness of appeal (R. 360 RoP)Costs upon mootness
  • 2025-04-22
    DismissedApplication Rop 265

    Court of Appeal dismissed Amazon's appeal against the Munich Local Division's refusal to disclose unredacted documents held by Nokia under Art.59 UPCA and R.190 RoP (evidence production). The appeal became devoid of purpose after the underlying infringement proceedings (UPC_CFI_399/2023) were declared closed following Nokia's withdrawal of the infringement action. The appeal was disposed of under R.360 RoP.

    Legal issues:Disposal of appeal for lack of purpose (R.360 RoP)Evidence production request (Art.59 UPCA, R.190 RoP)Effect of withdrawal of main infringement action on ancillary evidence proceedings
Documents
  • D95A5FF3E4331F1DB00815E9C84AED9A_de.pdf2025-04-22GERMAN
  • ORDER_R%20360_APL_67638-2024_App_16448_2025%20AMAZON%20v%20NOKIA%202025_04_22_EN.pdf2025-04-22GERMAN