UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 16448/2025

·EP2661892: MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Rücknahmeanträge
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Tim Smentkowski (Arnold Ruess)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Steffen Steininger (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Benjamin Schröer (Hogan Lovells International LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Telecommunications
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
22. Apr. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-04-22
    Application Rop 265

    Court of Appeal (Panel 1a) order on Amazon's appeal against a Munich Local Division order refusing Amazon's R. 190 RoP request for production of unredacted Nokia documents in infringement proceedings concerning EP 2 661 892. The appeal became moot (Erledigung der Hauptsache, R. 360 RoP) following a development in the main proceedings, and the Court issued a procedural order addressing costs in the now-resolved appeal.

    Rechtsfragen:Production of evidence (R. 190 RoP)Unredacted document disclosureMootness of appeal (R. 360 RoP)Costs upon mootness
  • 2025-04-22
    AbgewiesenApplication Rop 265

    Court of Appeal dismissed Amazon's appeal against the Munich Local Division's refusal to disclose unredacted documents held by Nokia under Art.59 UPCA and R.190 RoP (evidence production). The appeal became devoid of purpose after the underlying infringement proceedings (UPC_CFI_399/2023) were declared closed following Nokia's withdrawal of the infringement action. The appeal was disposed of under R.360 RoP.

    Rechtsfragen:Disposal of appeal for lack of purpose (R.360 RoP)Evidence production request (Art.59 UPCA, R.190 RoP)Effect of withdrawal of main infringement action on ancillary evidence proceedings
Dokumente
  • D95A5FF3E4331F1DB00815E9C84AED9A_de.pdf2025-04-22GERMAN
  • ORDER_R%20360_APL_67638-2024_App_16448_2025%20AMAZON%20v%20NOKIA%202025_04_22_EN.pdf2025-04-22GERMAN