View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Inc.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 28, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked |
At the UPC: Nera Innovations Ltd. (7 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CFI 730/2025·UPC CoA 692/2025·UPC CFI 424/2024·UPC CoA 205/2024·UPC CFI 173/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Hamburg LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-04-28
Summary: The Hamburg Local Division judge-rapporteur rejected Xiaomi's application to disregard certain submissions by Nera Innovations on patentability of auxiliary requests in its reply on the patent amendment application, holding that the submissions were a permissible deepening of earlier arguments and not late-filed new matter.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Admissibility of auxiliary requests in patent amendment application (R. 30.1(b), R. 32.3 RoP)
- Late-filed submissions
- Combination of auxiliary requests
Documents
- 07865594AC922704415F4C29DA7CBFA5_de.pdf2025-04-28DE