UPC APP 20143/2024

—

Case details: Status
—
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties: Claimants
Progress Maschinen & Automation AG
Reps: Markus Gangl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte); Florian Robl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte)
Respondents
AWM s.r.l.
SCHNELL S.p.A.
Reps: Not Specified
Division: Court of Appeal
Judges: —
Language: —
First decided: May 2, 2024

Decisions

2024-05-02
Generic application
The Court of Appeal issued an order on the application for suspensive effect filed by Progress Maschinen & Automation AG, concerning an order by the Milan Local Division that had granted preservation of evidence and inspection orders in favour of AWM and SCHNELL. The court examined whether suspensive effect was warranted to prevent the appeal from being rendered largely ineffective.
Legal issues:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 220 RoP)Preservation of evidence and inspection ordersAccess to expert reports by partiesEffectiveness of appeal pending execution

Documents